tv The Rachel Maddow Show MSNBC July 5, 2017 6:00pm-7:00pm PDT
show, that's not it. it's pitting mika and joe against cuomo? really? and that would be chris cuomo. and it goes without saying that this is unparalleled. >> lynn sweet and ben howe, thanks for being with me tonight. that is "all in" for this evening. "the rachel maddow show" starts right now. >> thanks, chris. happy fifth of july, i hope you had a little time off for the holiday. it's nice to have you here. when the republican presidential primary process started for this past presidential election cycle, it started on the republican side with a very clear favorite. just as strongly as hillary clinton was favored to be the democratic nominee, on the republican side, from the outset, the republican nomination was seen as jeb bush's to lose.
jeb bush had universal name recognition. his father had been president. his brother had been president. they both supported him and were working their considerable republican political networks to try to help sew up the nomination for good old jeb. jeb also started running very early, in the fall of 2014 he was already signaling that he was going to run for 2016. he very quickly built up the largest financial war chest in the republican primary. he stacked up $100 million right off the bat. and now, looking back on that effort, we remember of course how badly it ended for jeb bush. the first contest in the republican primary was in iowa. he didn't break 3% in iowa. next up was new hampshire. he came in fourth place in new hampshire. south carolina was next, members of the bush family running for president almost always win in south carolina. the only exception i think was george h.w. bush losing there to
ronald reagan in 1980. other than that, all bushes win in south carolina. this year, not only did jeb bush not win in south carolina. he didn't crack double digits in south carolina. so then he was out. usually when somebody does badly in a presidential primary, despite having raised a lot of money, you can usually explain how badly they did by calculating how much money they had to raise and spend for every delegate they ended up getting in the overall process. in jeb bush's case, you can't even do that math, because you can't divide by zero. you can't even divide $100 million by zero. his candidacy was just a gigantic bonfire of republican donor money. but you know what? it did not just go bad for him at the end. it i think is helpful to remember that it was really bad for him from the start. it was bad from launch. they had all these months to prepare for his campaign launch date in june 2015.
but everything around it just went bad. i mean, you might remember, for example, that instead of releasing a typical politician, you know, glossy auto biographical book like a lot of top tier candidates do at the start of a campaign, instead jeb bush got creative and released a bound version of his correspondence with his constituents from the time that he had been governor of florida. the idea was to show how, you know, detail oriented he was, how hands-on, how accessible he was to the residents of florida when he was governor. people could individually e-mail him, he would individually e-mail back about issues in the state and trying to solve people's problems. the problem was theyco la colla those and bound them, but it apparently never occurred to anybody to go through all the e-mails and make sure that people's individual private
unfortunate for jeb bush that his campaign kickoff butted right up against donald trump's much splashier campaign kickoff. but from the perspective of the bush campaign, the timing of the bush launch had been very carefully thought out. maybe they didn't think very much about donald trump also launching at that time. but they had reason to launch him, launch jeb, on june 15th. and that's because right before june 15th, jeb bush would be returning from what the campaign expected to be a triumphant european tour. the visuals would be perfect. yet another member of the bush family confidently striding through european capitals, meeting world leaders. jeb bush had been doing that sort of diplomacy for decades, now he would be doing it on his own terms. the idea was to imagine him as president.
his campaign at that point would be that the obama administration had been terribly weak on foreign policy and the jeb bush campaign would be strong and tough, and no one would mess with him on the world stage once jeb bush was back in charge. i'm quite sure the jeb bush campaign thought this european tour would produce a bunch of positive jeb news. definitely a bunch of good headlines, good visuals. and they planned to roll right out of that big european trip momentum and into his big "i am definitely running for president" speech. the problem is, in the lead up to that trip to europe, it did not go very well. one of the three places jeb bush visited was poland. the long time ruling party in poland is very pro-american, even on controversial issues poland went out of its way to support the u.s.
george w. bush famously told everybody to remember poland when america was putting together the coalition to invade iraq in 2003. in this big trip designed to kick off jeb bush's presidential campaign, by june 2015, when jeb got there, poland's ruling party had been in trouble at home for a while. and there were a lot of different things going on in their politics to explain it, their politics are just as complex as ours. but the dramatic, salacious thing that had been going on in poland, that had become the riveting center of polish politics, is that somebody had started bugging all of the most expensive restaurants in warsaw, the capital city. i don't know if it was a microphone in flower arrangements, maybe it was waiters operating as secret spies. as i understand it, nobody to this day understands how they did it.
but in multiple high end restaurants in warsaw, there were microphones. there were recording devices. and high ranking politicians all over warsaw in these expensive restaurants were recorded, talking over expensive meals about all sorts of stuff they should not have been talking about. it's not like they were talking about killing anybody or something, but it was like the ugly side of politics that politicians never want anybody to know about. they were trading political favors, undermining their leadership, talking smack about people not at the table, criticizing actions of the central bank which are things that should not be subject to political negotiations. a lot of truly embarrassing recordings of all these top politicians from the ruling party in poland. and the truly red-hot recording from those restaurant tapes was of their foreign minister, the equivalent of our secretary of state. this guy is very well-known in his country. he represents a pro america political party in poland. he himself is seen as being
particularly pro western, pro american. a lot of people thought of him as a future president or prime minister. and over a very expensive meal at this restaurant in warsaw, this guy, a foreign minister, supposedly so pro american, he was recorded saying that poland's alliance with the united states is bull -- i can't say it, bull stuff. bull pucky. he said poland's alliance with the united states was, quote, worthless. he said, quote, we'll get into a conflict with the russians or the germans and we'll think it's super because we gave the americans a blow -- i can't say this either. we gave -- we gave the americans a blow, and then there's enough syllables. and then at one point, either talking about america or talking about polish politicians who want to maintain this relationship with america, it's kind of hard to tell, he finished up by saying in this recording, he finished up by
saying, losers, complete losers. so he's the foreign minister of poland when he's saying these things. publicly, he's super pro united states. the biggest proponent there is of poland and america having a close allied relationship. but in private, that's how he's talking about the united states. and that scandal had been bubbling for a while in poland, until finally, in the summer of 2015, in june, it boiled over. these tapes had been circulating for a while. in june 2015, a kind of crack pot, right wing, anti-immigrant, would-be politician in poland miraculously came on, he says he discovered online more than 2,000 pages of secret documents from the government's internal investigation into those tapes. we have no idea how that guy got those documents. they did seem to be real documents or at least people
believed that they were. these were the internal investigation documents from the government looking into this scandal. and this thing, this tapes thing from these restaurants, that had been simmering for a long time in polish politics, but when that big document dump came out, 2,000 pages of the internal investigation documents, that just blew it open. that was just too much, and boom, in one night, half the cabinet resigned. a whole bunch of top political advisers to the ruling party, to the government, resigned. the speaker of the house resigned. everybody all in one night, goodbye. and then the very next day is when jeb bush showed up. for his big meeting, for his big meeting that was supposed to make him look really presidential and super tough on foreign affairs. and the guy he was scheduled to meet with was the former foreign minister who had just resigned the night before in disgrace over him being caught on tape dissing the united states and talking about how terrible the united states is and how stupid poland is to try to maintain a
good relationship with the united states and how worthless it is to have a relationship with the united states. the day after he had to resign because of talking all that trash about the united states, the next day, there is jeb, who doesn't think to maybe cancel this photo op. and it's not a photo op where he's confronting this guy and sticking up for the united states and lambasting him for dragging the country through the mud. he does it as a smiling, shaking hands photo open. hey, i like this guy. okay, tough guy. and then three days later, there was jeb bush, formally announcing his campaign. but nobody remembers it because the day after that, the guy who chriss christenned him "low energy jeb"
declared his candidacy. trump went to poland today. that scandal with the secret microphones and expensive restaurants ends up being really important to what happened to the world since and what happened today. around the time of the tapes in the restaurants scandal, in the face of all those resignations from the ruling party, the ruling party insisted at the time that the whole scandal, the recording of those conversations, the leaking of those recorded conversations, the conveniently timed release of all the secret documents somehow hacked out of the internal investigation, the ruling party that was really wiped out by that scandal, insisted the whole time while it was happening that the scandal had been orchestrated by the russian government, that russian intelligence had somehow done this, that it was designed to bring down the long time ruling party in poland because that party was seen as being too friendly to the west, too friendly to the united states. that allegation never gained much traction with the polish public. or if it did, it didn't work.
and the ruling party did get taken down. since then the long time ruling party in poland has been replaced with a very right wing, nationalist party that's seen by its critics as having kind of a scary authoritarian streak. they're called the law and justice party. they have not just pursued conservative policies. they have changed the structure of their country's government in order to consolidate in themselves all forms of political power. they have taken over the supreme court in that country. they have removed the independent leadership of the secret services in that country. they have put severe restrictions on the private media. they have taken over public media to turn it into russian-style pure pro-government propaganda. the previous foreign minister might have privately said some uncould you te uncouth things about the united states, but the current prime
minister is happy to say it in public. their foreign minister went on tv last spring and said that poland, forgive me for what i'm about to say, said that poland would no longer have a, quote, negro mentality when it comes to that country's relationship with the united states. i am sorry to repeat his phrasing, but that is what he said. and even in translation, the polish version of what he said is just as offensive as the english version. this is their current foreign minister. he's also publicly denounced race mixing, which is nice. and poland is not necessarily at ease with its very radical new government. remember the giant women's marches that happened in this country right after donald trump was inaugurated? those were preceded by -- look at this, by a women's protest in poland against draconian new abortion proposals from their new right wing government. the images from those women's protests in poland were just
stunning. there is definitely dissent inside that country against their very right wing nationalist new government. this is the government they've got now. the law and justice party says they're about to start taking over the lower courts below the supreme court as well which will get them quite some distance toward what appears to be an authoritarian takeover of what used to be a democracy. that is the sort of thing a visiting american president would usually be expected to raise a stink about. not this one. polish media recordedported ahe the visit by president trump, the law and justice party, they told the white house they could guarantee cheering crowds for trump's visit today. polish media reported the ruling party planned to bus in people specifically to cheer for donald trump. we don't know if that's part of the reason that president trump agreed to go to warsaw today. but on the polish side at least, that's apparently what they offered to get him there.
cyberattack on our presidential election last year and threatening to shoot down u.s. jets over syria and sending fighter jets to buzz american ships and planes all over the world, and allegations that russian firms are selling weapons and oil to north korea as north korea is shooting off an icbm. other than that, what has putin done to earn this? since crimea, i don't know. maybe there's something that vladimir putin has done that's really nice alongside that other stuff. whatever it is, we, the public, don't know about it. he is nevertheless getting a bilateral meeting with the american president because of something. and whatever you think about how well jeb bush did at running for president, or how well you think any of the other republicans did at running for president against trump, had any of them been better at it, had jeb bush become president or any normal republican become president or any democrat become president, it would be inconceivable that
any of this that's happening right now would be happening, from this meeting today in poland with the law and justice party, given what they've done, to this bilateral meeting face-to-face with putin at the g20. in normal american politics, let alone in democratic politics, what is happening this week is inconceivable. we're in territory now that until recently would not have been imaginable within american politics. watch this space. award winning interface. award winning design. award winning engine. the volvo xc90. the most awarded luxury suv of the century. visit your volvo dealer today and get up to $4,500 in allowances.
cohigher!ad! higher! parents aren't perfect, but then they make us kraft mac & cheese and everything's good again. number 360™ smart bed. it senses your every move and automatically adjusts on both sides. right now save on sleep number 360™ smart beds. plus, it's the lowest prices of the season with savings of $500 on our most popular p5 bed. ends sunday.
pain's kind of self-defining. not when it hurts, it hurts. when i can't do something, it makes me feel isolated. with aleve, you can stay strong longer because only aleve has the strength to stop tough pain for up to 12 hours with just one pill. tylenol can't do that. i get to be present and enjoy what i love. this is my pain. but i am stronger. aleve. all day strong. all day long.
planning going on before president trump meets with vladimir putin face-to-face on friday. a senior official tells the daily beast when it comes to the u.s. preparation for that meeting, quote, the idea is to get as many adults in the room as humanly possible. that would be adults in addition to the president himself. specifically daily beast is reporting tonight there is efforts to try to squeeze into the room with trump and putin a hawk when it comes to russia and who wrote, quote, a critical psychological biography of vladimir putin. so just think about -- take kind of a meta look at this for a second. the sources for this story in the daily beast tonight are trump administration officials. so if this reporting is true, that means senior people working for this president are willing to admit to reporters that there is reason to worry about what might happen if the president is ever truly alone with vladimir
putin. so they are scheming now to try to not let that happen. to try to put somebody else in the room who might have a better idea of how to deal with vladimir putin. someone who is trying to help from the outside with u.s. preparations for this meeting with former u.s. ambassador to russia michael mcfaul who gift the administration this short cheat sheet entitled, quote, what trump needs to read before meeting putin. ambassador mcfaul, thanks for being here. >> thanks for having me. >> if you think that it is unusual that president trump is getting a meeting with vladimir putin right now. >> it is somewhat incredible, given the audacious things that he did. he's the first guy who has annexed territory in europe since world war ii. the first leader that's attacked
us, attacked our sovereignty during our elections. that's different from other leaders with the kremlin. that said, i think most of these g20 meetings, you have these bilats, i think it's proper for president trump to meet with them if in fact he's going to talk about those issues. if he's just going to talk about, isn't it great to get along and my good friend vladimir putin, that will be a giant victory for the kremlin. >> what do you think that the russians would like to get out of this meeting, and you wrote about this a little bit in "the washington post," what should the u.s., the president himself, be on guard in terms of what the kremlin is trying to achieve here? >> well, i've been in many meetings with vladimir putin, when i worked at the white house, actually had fiona hill's job, for the record, back in 2009. it's crazy that the senior director for russian affairs would not be in that meeting. and if she were in that meeting and briefing the president, i think she would be warning him that vladimir putin wants to be
friendly with president trump. he wants to say to him, you and i, we can work together, we can do some big things together. but it's that fake news you have in your country, it's the deep state in your country that's getting in the way. but if you work with me, he can do big things. here, by the way, to get us off on a good start, donald, he might call him donald, probably not, maybe president trump, why don't you lift sanctions on us, because if you do that, i guarantee you, you and i can be friends. that's a horrible deal for america but that's a deal that putin will be bringing to the table. >> what's the right response to that, if you were counseling a u.s. president prepared to hear this, what should a u.s. president say in response to that? >> i think president trump should say, vladimir putin, i am ready and willing and eager to lift sanctions. i want to lift sanctions. i want to do business with russia. but in order to do so, you have to get out of ukraine. that's why the sanctions were put in place.
i want to do business with you and lift those other sanctions. but in order to do so, you have to pledge to me that you're not going to interfere in our elections again. that's why the sanctions were put in place. and to lift them unilaterally, that's called a concession. that's called appeasement. that is not in america's national interests. >> michael mcfaul, former ambassador to russia, thank you for talking to us tonight, but thank you for the earnest approach you took in this "washington post" piece. >> i was trying. >> a lot of people are scared about what was going to happen in that meeting. but for you to take it on seriously and earnestly and say, don't be scared, let's make the most of it, that was a civic minded approach. >> i appreciate your comment, rachel, thanks for having me. >> stay with us.
can we at least analyze customer traffic? can we push the offer online? legacy technology can handcuff any company. but "yes" is here. you're saying the new app will go live monday? yeah. with help from hpe, we can finally work the way we want to. with the right mix of hybrid it, everything computes.
zone, north korea has been stocking up militarily on its side for a long time now. they've deployed nearly 70% of their ground forces within 60 miles of their border, as well as half of the north korean air force. they've also got thousands of artillery cannons and rocket launchers stationed on the border directly facing south korea and facing seoul. in april, north korea demonstrated its artillery might off its eastern coastline in the largest live artillery drill north korea has ever conducted. the world is focused on the threat of a nuclear armed, rather nutty north korea. but north korea doesn't need to use its dozen or so nuclear weapons if it wants to kill tens of thousands, potentially hundreds of thousands of civilians, before the u.s. or anybody else could eventually shut down their capacity to do so. and that geographical fact is the real life irreducible military constraint that rings
every consideration of what to do about north korea and their behavior as a sort of rogue nation. on monday, north korea fired what is believed to be an intercontinental ballistic missile, which means the threatening range of not just their conventional capacity but maybe their nuclear capacity as well, may now reach beyond their nearby enemies, our allies, south korea and japan, their capacity to project force may reach as far as alaska. after the icbm test, the u.s. and south korean militaries today did a missile exercise of their own in response. today u.s. ambassador nikki haley argued for more sanctions against north korea at the u.n. what else is really possible here? what does the united states and the pentagon consider to be on the menu of available options, now that something the president said would never happen, an icbm test, has come to pass? joining us now is courtney kubey, nbc news national security producer, thanks for being here. >> thank you, it's my pleasure.
>> so president trump said not long ago that it would never happen that north korea would ever test an icbm, he said it would not happen. how certain is the pentagon that this actually was an icbm test by them? >> well, they feel fairly certain that this was -- this was a missile that has the capacity to be an icbm. >> okay. >> what's kind of confusing here is, this missile was fired directly straight up into the air with this very high and very narrow arch. so it flew up into space, and then it landed back in the sea of japan, really only a couple of hundred miles from where it was launched from, that's what's kind of confusing here. but when you consider the distance it flew going from the land in north korea, up into space, and splashing down in the sea of japan, that's when we see it has a capability of potentially being an icbm intercontinental missile. the range sort of varies but the
u.s. military generally considers something that flies 6400 miles is considered an intercontinental ballistic missile. >> obviously the whole world has close eyes on north korea and their nuclear capability. it's believed they have a dozen or so nuclear weapons. what do we know about their ability to put that kind of a warhead on this kind of a missile? >> so what we know is that they haven't demonstrated that capability. i don't know if you would find anyone in the u.s. military at the highest levels who would say with confidence or certainty that they don't absolutely have that capability. i think that they're hopeful they do not, since they haven't demonstrated or tested it. but what people don't realize is, you know, this missile that they tested last night, it's a kn-17 with a reentry vehicle added onto the top. it's what the military calls a two-stage. some of these missiles that north korea is testing now are wider, they have a wider base. the miniaturization process isn't as difficult as some might think.
they don't actually have to miniaturize the warhead as small as they have on the other missiles. at this point we don't believe they have that capability yet. but what we saw yesterday is they are making rapid advancements in their program. i don't think at this point it's even fair to say they have an icbm capability, that they are a confident icbm nation, because the way they tested this, it's not something that necessarily would be able to fly in a straight trajectory yet. but the fact that they're testing it on such an aggressive schedule shows they're moving forward. every time they test, even when a test fails, which this one doesn't seem to have, they're learning. it's just like the u.s. nuclear program was years ago. they failed and failed, they had a 60% failure rate at one point. but every time they learned and got better and better. north korea is demonstrated not just that capability, but that intent at this point. >> courtney kube, nbc news national security producer. this story is always lurking in
the background. we are told that barack obama warned donald trump on his way into office that this was basically the number one threat in the world. i have a feeling we're going to be talking to you a lot about it in the coming days as the u.s. decides how they're going to respond. thank you, courtney. we'll be right back, stay with us. ♪ if you could book a flight, then add a hotel, or car, or activity in one place and save, where would you go? ♪
expedia gives you the world in your hand, so you can see more of it. ♪ expedia. i'm not going to let it paichange my life. air. aleve is proven stronger on pain than tylenol 8 hour. and only aleve has the strength to stop tough pain for up to 12 hours with just 1 pill. this is my pain, but i am stronger. aleve. all day strong. explore your treatment options with specialists who treat only cancer. every stage... every day.... at cancer treatment centers of america. learn more at cancercenter.com/experts
don't back down from oic. talk to your doctor about movantik. remember mo-van-tik. if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help. fitting into my skinny jeans ♪again? that's cool. feeling good in slim fit? that's cool. looking fabulous in my little black dress? that's cool. getting the body you want without surgery, needles, or downtime? that's coolsculpting. coolsculpting is the only fda-cleared non-invasive treatment that targets and freezes away stubborn fat cells. visit coolsculpting.com today and register for a chance to win a free treatment. on thursday, just before the holiday break, "the wall street journal" published what appears to be the first evidence of an american effort to collude with,
cooperate with the russian attack on our election last year. "wall street journal" reporter shane harris spoke with a long time republican operative who told him around labor day weekend last year he mounted an effort to put together a team of technology experts and investigators and lawyers who would reach out to russian hackers, hackers he thought would be close to the russian government, to try to obtain from them e-mails they might have hacked from hillary clinton. the republican operative's goal was essentially to obtain those stolen clinton e-mails from russian hackers and then use whatever is in them to try to harm hillary clinton's election chances. now, that republican operative, his name is peter smith. he has a long history in republican politics and oppo research and dirty tricks, specifically against the clintons. smith was 81 years old. he died shortly after being interviewed by "the wall street journal" earlier this year. peter smith said he had been working independently, that he
wasn't a part of the trump campaign, but as "the journal" reported, he told other people at the time he was putting together this effort, he told them repeatedly that he was working with people from the trump campaign. specifically he said multiple times to multiple people that he was working with then-senior adviser to the trump campaign, mike flynn. that was the initial reporting from "the journal" on thursday. on friday, is in the wall street journal" posted a followup, reporting that in his attempt to recruit others to his caught, peter smith circulated a document which named a lot more trump campaign officials who are incidentally serving in the administration, kellyanne conway, sam clovis, followed by the words "in coordination to the extent permitted as an independent expenditure."
that was the followup story from "the wall street journal." we reported that friday night, as that news broke. that same night, after the show, another shoe dropped in this story when one of the people who was contacted by peter smith about these efforts to get hillary clinton's e-mails from the russian hackers, one of the guys who was sort of in on it, who knew about it in realtime, he published his version of events. the title of his piece was, "the time i got recruited to collude with the russians." his name, as you can see the byline there, is matt tate, a british cybersecurity expert. he says peter smith contacted him in the heat of the campaign, asking for his help in authenticating supposed clinton documents he had obtained from russian hackers. matt tate is very explicit that peter smith clearly didn't care if he had to collude with the russian government in order to
get these documents that might hurt clinton. although he can't definitively prove it, matt tate says it's his belief that peter smith was operating in coordination with the trump campaign. quote, my perception then was that the inclusion of trump campaign officials on this document was not merely a name dropping exercise. this document was about establishing a company to conduct opposition researcher on behalf of the campaign but operating at a distance to avoid campaigning, the. the combination of smith's deep knowledge of the inner workings of the campaign, this document naming him in the trump campaign group and the multiple references to needing to avoid campaigning, the, suggested to me that the group was formed with the blessing of the trump campaign. so peter smith, putting together this effort, listing members of the trump campaign who he's operating with, coordinating with to the extent available by law, but when it comes to listing the trump campaign
people who were involved in this effort, he lists himself under the subheading trump campaign. hmm. joining us now, shane harris, senior writer for is in t"the w street journal," he broke the story. thanks for being here tonight, i appreciate it. >> hi, rachel, thanks for having me. >> since you first broke this story on thursday night, let me ask if i've summarized what's happened since then accurately and if you have anything to add thus far. >> no, you summarized it perfectly accurately. the only thing i'll say in addition is matt tate, who has now come out publicly as a source on this story, is a highly credible individual, and has never been someone who i have known to exaggerate or say more than he knows and believes. so i think that essay that he wrote is well worth reading. >> in terms of his involvement here, he is not a u.s. citizen, nor does he appear at least from what we know about him to have
had partisan leanings in our election. is it your sense that he might have been involved in this, to the extent he was, because he was trying to hurt hillary clinton's chances, trying to help the trump campaign? >> no, not at all, far from it. in fact matt didn't really have a dog in that fight. peter smith contacted matt, as he told this to me and is now clear from the facts coming out, because he was aware of that matt, who has quite a twitter fo following, actually, had been commenting during the release of hillary clinton's e-mails from her server and commenting on the what the makeup of that server might have been, peter smith sought him out. i think peter smith may have assumed to some degree, based on my reporting, that matt was sort of allied in this idea with peter smith of supposing hillary clinton. but clearly that was not the case and ultimately matt tate did not go forward with peter smith in this effort that he tried to recruit him for to get
these e-mails from russian hackers. >> and shane, in your reporting, you're very clear about the fact that there's no indication that smith was working for the trump campaign when he was doing this. you describe it as being an independent effort in support of trump's campaign, but independent from the campaign. in matt tate's writeup, he's basically saying smith described himself as being part of the campaign, that he listed his own name under the subheading "trump campaign" when he was circulating this document of people who were at least being read in on what this effort was all about. does that seem contradictory to you? >> i don't think so. i think what we're dealing with right now is trying to understand the degree of connection between these two worlds. for the first part, it is clear that peter smith knew people in the trump campaign.
he knew mike flynn. that is not in dispute. they were in communications or understanding. whether it was about this particular thing i think is still a matter for more reporting. kellyanne conway told us she had known peter smith but hadn't seen him in some time. matt came away with this impression after several conversations with peter smith that he was holding himself out as someone involved in the campaign. we want to be very careful in our own reporting that we're just saying as much as we know at this point, and that was very much matt's depression at the time. i think the idea that somehow peter smith was some completely unknown entity to people in the trump campaign doesn't really hold up. i thought it was very notable that a trump campaign official told us for our first story that if peter smith was engaged with general flynn in some kind of coordination, that was something that general flynn was doing on his own as a private citizen. i'm not sure where the campaign draws that distinction between when he's on campaign time and when he's on private time. but it was very notable that they did not come out and say
that there was nothing to this, that they were only trying to sort of bifurcate this role that mike flynn had in the campaign of being national security adviser and ultimately white house national security adviser and private citizen and holding out the possibility that he may have been doing things in the latter role. >> and that of course may have something to do with the other big half of your scoop, which was that versinvestigators haven intelligence reports that describe russian hackers discussing how to obtain clinton e-mails and get them through an intermediary to mike flynn. if those intelligence reports exist and are accurate and those observations were in fact recorded and true, it's going to be hard for the trump campaign to mount a defense about this saying that nothing ever happened. they'll instead need an explanation for why it happening doesn't implicate them. right? >> i think that's right. i think those intelligence reports are a very important piece of this. that you contemporaneous to this
activity that peter smith is engaged in, you have russian hackers talking about something that looks an awful lot like what peter smith is doing. it's another key data point in in this that kind of yunt cuts any idea that this was peter smith making something up. there is really sort of an echo at the very least that sounds like what he is doing. that's something certainly at the journal we're digging into, investigating further. >> really appreciate your time tonight. thanks for being here. >> thanks, rachel. >> we'll be right back. stay with us. for you. woah. flo and jamie here to see hqx. flo and jamie request entry. slovakia. triceratops. tapioca. racquetball. staccato. me llamo jamie. pumpernickel. pudding. employee: hey, guys! home quote explorer. it's home insurance made easy. password was "hey guys." delicious pasta marinara.
here's something to watch for overnight tonight and into tomorrow. the great state of virginia has a democratic governor right now, terry mcauliffe. he said he is personally opposed to the death penalty, but there have been two executions carried out since mcauliffe has been governor. that said, 9:00 tomorrow night, virginia is scheduled to execute a man whose family and friends and lawyers contend is seriously mentally ill and delusional. right up through these very last hours, over the next 23 hours, supporters of this man and people who are concerned about this execution have been mounting an increasingly intention campaign to try to convince terry mcauliffe to stop this particular execution. nbc news has been reporting on this. they describe a coalition of groups from mental health advocates to clergy to the european union and the united
nations, all calling for a reprieve in this execution based specifically on this man's mental state. "the washington post" has been reporting on this case for years. they've documented what the man's mental state look the like to people around him. just after high school, the post reports he was known to have walked barefoot in winter and sometimes slept in the jefferson national forest buried in piles of leaves. he confided in family and friends about what he said were the special powers he possessed to fix the world's problems. friends say he became consumed by unusual eating patterns. he would eat large amounts of raw meat and nuts and pinecones. when he was 20 years old, virginia tech police found him after 9:00 in the evening half naked on the floor of a women's bathroom on campus. they're nearly two years later, he showed up to his father's funeral barefoot. he told his mother he was training to live in the wild because he had been chosen on
behalf of native americans. a year later, he was charged for a series of poorly executed armed robberies and thefts. he spent a year in jail awaiting trial. his mental health there reportedly deteriorated. his lawyers say he came to believe he was in jail because somebody wanted him to die. that reportedly led him to attempt an escape from jail in 2006. during that egs cascape, he kiln unarmed security guard and a sheriff's deputy. for those crimes he was sentenced to die. his lawyers say it was not made clear at trial how separated from reality he was. today, it's not clear whether he's even aware right now of this remarkable effort under way in virginia tonight to try to win him clemency. that's in part because he has refused to see his mother or his lawyers for years because i believes that they too are part of a grand conspiracy to kill him. and tomorrow night, he will be executed unless governor terry mcauliffe steps in and stops it.
again, mcauliffe is a democrat and is personally opposed to the death penalty. this is not your typical death penalty case, and the effort to try to stop this one is, as i say, getting more and more intense over the course of today, into tonight, and watch for it tomorrow. terly mcauliffe reportedly still considering this matter late tonight. stay with us. i no longer live with the uncertainties of hep c. wondering, what if? i let go of all those feelings. because i am cured with harvoni.
harvoni is a revolutionary treatment for the most common type of chronic hepatitis c. it's been prescribed to more than a quarter million people. and is proven to cure up to 99% of patients who have had no prior treatment with 12 weeks. certain patients can be cured with just 8 weeks of harvoni. before starting harvoni, your doctor will test to see if you've ever had hepatitis b, which may flare up and cause serious liver problems during and after harvoni treatment. tell your doctor if you've ever had hepatitis b, a liver transplant, other liver or kidney problems, hiv or any other medical conditions and about all the medicines you take including herbal supplements. taking amiodarone with harvoni can cause a serious slowing of your heart rate. common side effects of harvoni include tiredness, headache and weakness. ready to let go of hep c? ask your hep c specialist about harvoni. lobster and shrimp are teaming up in so many new dishes.fest, like coastal lobster and shrimp, with shrimp crusted with kettle chips. or new, over-the-top lobster and shrimp overboard.
but it can't last, so hurry in. we cut the price of trades to give investors even more value. and at $4.95, you can trade with a clear advantage. fidelity, where smarter investors will always be. (singsong) budget meeting. sweet. if you compare last quarter... it's no wonder everything seems a little better with the creamy taste of philly, made with no artificial preservatives, flavours or dyes. toddlers see things a bit no artundifferently preservatives, with pampers easy ups they'll see a stretchy waistband you'll see pampers' superior protection and you'll both see an easy way to underwear pampers easy ups heads up. tomorrow night on this show, we've got a little bit of a scoop. this is a story that is
definitely exclusive to us. it is something that we kind of stumbled into without trying to find it, but we found it. we have been working for weeks now to nail it down. it is finally ready to go. i am almost sure that we are going to have it for you tomorrow night. and i encourage you to check it out. it's a weird story. as i say, i won't say more than that. tomorrow night. see you again then. it is now time for "the last word" with lawrence o'donnell. good evening. >> now i know what i'm doing tomorrow night at 9:00. >> thank you, my friend. >> that's just a lovely cliff-hanger, and i'm sure we just picked up an awful lot of 9:00 p.m. viewers tomorrow night. so you've been working on -- any hints? any category? >> i was just thinking, like, i know i'm being outrageously vague about this. but i don't even consider this to be a tease. this is more like a warning. we have a strange exclusive story tomorrow that has taken us a long time to nail down.